Joint Statement: Bar Associations and International Lawyers’ Organisations Call for Protection of Lawyers in Iran

The undersigned bar associations and international lawyers’ organisations call for the Islamic Republic of Iran and its agencies to protect, promote, and support the following basic rights:

1) the independence of the legal profession;

2) the principle of lawyer-client confidentiality;

3) the right to have access to a legal representative;

4) the right to prepare a defence.

This joint statement has been issued to help secure immediate, coordinated, multi-sectoral action on legal independence in Iran to guarantee lawyers practice their profession without fear of repression or persecution.

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution and increasingly over the years, the legal profession in Iran has lost its independence and lawyers have been subjected to detentions, harassments, and persecutions.

  • Policies and practices have been established by the regime that restrict and violate the independence of lawyers and judges, which leave the hands of the state open to convict those that “deviate” on charges such as “conspiracy against national security”, “propaganda activities against the Islamic Republic of Iran” and “cooperation with hostile states”.
  • Note to Article 48 of Iran’s Code of Criminal Procedure among others[1] is particularly problematic.
  • Note to Article 48 of the Code of Criminal Procedure states: “In cases of crimes against internal or external security, and in cases involving organized crime, where Article 302 of this code is applicable, during the investigation phase, the parties to the dispute are to select their attorneys from a list approved by the head of the judiciary.” In this note, lawyers are divided into two categories: lawyers who are trusted by the head of the judiciary and those who are not. The criteria on the basis of which trusted lawyers are appointed are set by the head of the judiciary. It is noteworthy that Article 48 of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates that: “When a suspect is arrested, he or she can request the presence of an attorney. The attorney, observing the secret nature of the investigation and the negotiations between the parties, should meet with the suspect. At the end of the meeting, which should not last more than one hour, the attorney may submit his or her written notes to be included in the case file.” However, the Revolutionary Courts, where “security-related” cases such as those involving human rights, political, and civil activists, are much less transparent than Public Courts. The judges at the Revolutionary Courts are known to abuse their legal powers. They deny access to legal representation during the investigation phase and prevent lawyers from accessing client files on the basis of confidentiality or that lawyers have insufficient “qualifications” to review certain files.
  • Systematic pressure: Lawyers in Iran are systematically pressured and harassed in various ways. Lawyers who undertake cases despite such restrictions are often threatened, intimidated, and ultimately imprisoned. Bureaucratic requirements, and even reprisals against lawyers (usually depending on the nature of their case) often make it extremely difficult for legal professionals to supply their clients access to adequate defence, and thereby restricts the ability of defendants to receive and access a fair trial.
  • Threats and arrests Over the years, restrictions and threats against lawyers in Iran have caused many in the profession to avoid defending the people that need it most, including minorities and other marginalized defendants as these are often the most politicized cases. Since the death of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish girl who died in a hospital in Tehran due to injuries sustained by authorities after she was arrested by the “morality police” for wearing an “improper hijab”, and start of the nation-wide unrest, more than 430 human rights defenders[2] have been arrested, including at least 22 lawyers.

Calls of interest

In line with the basic principles on the role of lawyers, and in consideration of the above, we signatories of this statement call on the Islamic Republic of Iran and all its related agencies to take immediate steps aimed at protecting and supporting the independence of the legal profession and lawyers in Iran.

  • Considering some members of the Judiciary including its head are appointed by the Supreme Leader, both the state and the Judiciary must dissociate themselves from independent lawyers. The state must ensure all persons are entitled to call upon the assistance of a lawyer of their choice to protect and establish their rights and to defend them in all stages of criminal proceedings. This includes the lawyers, who are now themselves, incarcerated.
  • Laws and regulations must be amended, and state practice must be changed to ensure the following:
    • Lawyers are able to perform all their professional functions without intimidation, hinderance, harassment, or improper interference. The state must also ensure that lawyers do not suffer, or be threatened with, prosecution or administrative, economic or other sanctions for any action taken in accordance with recognized professional duties, standards and ethics.
    • Lawyers are adequately safeguard by authorities where their security is threatened as a result of discharging their functions.
    • Lawyers are not identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their functions.
    • The right of an attorney to appear before a court or a public authority shall not be restricted.
    • Lawyers must have access to appropriate information, files and documents in their possession or control in sufficient time to enable lawyers to provide effective legal assistance to their clients. Such access should be provided at the earliest appropriate time.

In the 43 years of the ruling of the Islamic Republic of Iran, lawyers have been systematically pressured and harassed in various ways. One of the things that restricts lawyers in the field of defence is the establishment of rules and regulations that ignore the matter of defence and deprive lawyers of the freedom to defend their clients. When they do represent their clients despite such restrictions, they are often threatened, intimidated, and ultimately imprisoned. Threats against lawyers in Iran continue to grow and lawyers find themselves under increased surveillance. We, the undersigned, demand that the Islamic Republic and its agencies respect and support the following:

  1. Immediate release of all lawyers arrested for any action taken in accordance with recognized professional duties, standards and ethics.
  2. Immediate cease of prosecution of all lawyers prosecuted for any action taken in accordance with recognized professional duties, standards and ethics.
  3. Complete preservation of the independence of the legal profession.
  4. Right of individuals, lawyers included, under the rule of law.
  5. Right of the accused to be accorded a fair trial.
  6. Right of the lawyers to undertake the representation of clients (including other lawyers) or causes without fear of repression or persecution.

Signed by:

  1. International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute
  2. German Federal Bar
  3. European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and Human Rights
  4. Association of Lawyers for Freedom (Özgürlük için Hukukçular Derneği)
  5. Defence Commission of the Barcelona Bar Association
  6. European Democratic Lawyers
  7. Association of Berlin Defence Lawyers (Vereinigung Berliner Strafverteidiger)
  8. Republican Lawyers Association (Republikanischer Anwältinnen- und Anwälteverein)
  9. Montpellier Bar association
  10. Human Rights Institution of Montpellier 
  11. Progressive Lawyers’ Association (Çağdaş Hukukçular Derneği)
  12. Hanseatic Bar Hamburg, Germany (Hanseatische Rechtsanwaltskammer Hamburg)

[1] Article 191, Article 346, Note to Article 346, Article 385, Note to Article 297

[2] Between 16 September – 6 October, at least 300 human rights defenders were arrested (https://www.iranintl.com/202210065096); between 30 October – 3 November, at least 150 human rights defenders were arrested (https://www.radiofarda.com/a/32120083.html).

Le monde entier regarde

Une délégation de plus de 60 observateurs internationaux condamne le jugement de la Cour dans le cadre des poursuites pénales engagées depuis une décennie contre 21 avocats de ÇHD (Progressive Lawyers’ Association) et HHB (People’s Law Office) : La délégation prévient que “le monde entier regarde”.

 

Cette semaine, nous – plus de 60 avocats de 9 pays représentant plus de 30 barreaux, ONG et associations professionnelles d’avocats – avons observé les dernières audiences du procès de masse qui a débuté en 2013 contre 22 avocats du ÇHD (Association des avocats progressistes) et du HHB (Bureau du droit du peuple). Il n’en reste désormais plus que 21, Ebru Timtik étant décédé – en grève de la faim pour un procès équitable – au cours de ces procédures.

Aujourd’hui, ces avocats ont été condamnés pour appartenance à une organisation terroriste et participation à la propagande terroriste, et de longues peines de prison ont été prononcées.

Ces condamnations et ces peines constituent une violation intégrale du droit à un procès équitable, des Principes de base des Nations unies relatifs au rôle du barreau et de l’État de droit.

Les seuls faits matériels portés à la connaissance de la Cour étaient strictement liés aux activités professionnelles des accusés en tant qu’avocats dans le domaine des droits de l’homme : participation à une conférence de presse, présence dans ou à proximité d’une manifestation, conseil à des clients sur leur droit de garder le silence, défense de suspects accusés de terrorisme, etc. Au cours de l’enquête, certains des avocats accusés ont été soumis à des écoutes téléphoniques pendant plus d’un an, dans une violation apparente du caractère absolu du secret professionnel des avocats.

Les Principes de base de l’ONU garantissent spécifiquement le droit des avocats à participer au débat public et à s’associer entre eux et stipulent en outre que les avocats ne doivent jamais être identifiés à leurs clients ou aux causes de leurs clients, ni faire l’objet de poursuites pour une action conforme à leurs devoirs professionnels.

De plus, nos collègues ont été privés de leur droit à un procès équitable. Leur demande de temps suffisant pour présenter leur défense a été rejetée par la Cour, qui n’a accordé que cinq petits jours d’audience pour 21 défendeurs, et a rejeté la demande des défendeurs de reporter l’audience afin de permettre un examen adéquat des preuves, en particulier des documents électroniques dont l’authenticité est sérieusement mise en doute.

Le procès s’est tenu dans une salle d’audience de la prison de Silivri, avec une forte présence policière. Les accusés ont été séparés de leurs avocats par deux rangées de policiers, ce qui a empêché les accusés et leurs avocats de communiquer en toute confidentialité.

Les droits des accusés ont également été violés par le fait que la procédure n’a pas été menée à son terme dans un délai raisonnable, le procès étant en cours depuis dix ans sans qu’il y ait de justification appropriée à la prolongation de la procédure.

De plus, pour plusieurs des accusés, ce procès repose sur des faits et des preuves qui ont déjà été utilisés dans le procès de 2017 contre sept des mêmes accusés, en violation du principe selon lequel personne ne doit être jugé deux fois pour la même infraction.

Enfin, nous sommes profondément préoccupés par l’indépendance du pouvoir judiciaire et l’état de droit. En attaquant ces avocats pour leur défense des droits de l’homme, ce sont les droits de l’homme, la démocratie et l’État de droit qui sont assiégés.

Nous sommes toujours fiers d’être solidaires de nos courageux collègues, et nous demandons une fois de plus leur libération immédiate.

Le monde entier regarde

.

Signatures:

  • Barreau d’Amsterdam
  • Asociación Libre de Abogadas y Abogados, Madrid (ALA)
  • AVOCATS.BE – Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophones de Belgique
  • Barreau de Berlin
  • Barreau de Bologne
  • Barreau de Bordeaux
  • Barreau de Bruxelles
  • Conférence Régionale des Bâtonniers de l Ouest
  • Criminal Committee of the International Association of Lawyers
  • Défense sans frontières – Avocats solidaires, France (DSF-AS)
  • Dutch League for Human Rights
  • Barreau d’Épinal
  • European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, ELDH
  • European Democratic Lawyer – Avocats européens démocrates (AED)
  • Fair Trial Watch
  • Foundation Day of the Endangered Lawyer
  • européens  Hauts-de-Seine
  • Institut des droits de l’homme de Montpellier
  • La Conférence des Bâtonniers de France
  • Lawyers for Lawyers
  • Barreau de Liege-Huy
  • Barreau de Lyon
  • Barreau de Marseille
  • Barreau de Montpellier Bar
  • National Association of Democratic Jurists, Italy (GD)
  • National Lawyers Guild, US
  • Republikanischer Anwältinnen – und Anwälteverein e.V. (RAV)
  • Syndicat des Avocats de France
  • Syndicat des Avocats Pour la Démocratie, Belgium
  • The Association for the Support of Fundamental Rights Athens, Greece
  • The Center of Research and Elaboration on Democracy/ Legal International Intervention Group
  • Le Barreau fédéral allemande
  • L’Observatoire international des avocats en danger (OIAD), composé de 47 barreaux d’Espagne, de France, d’Italie, d’Allemagne, de Suisse, de Belgique, de Turquie, du Cameroun et de la République démocratique du Congo.
  • Barreau de Toulouse
  • UIA-IROL (l’Institut pour l’État de droit de l’Association internationale des juristes)

 

The world is watching

Delegation of 60+ International Trial Observers Condemns Court Judgment in Decade-Long Criminal Prosecution of 21 Lawyers from ÇHD (Progressive Lawyers Association) and HHB (People’s Law Office): Delegation Warns That “The World is Watching”

This week, we – more than 60 lawyers from 9 countries representing more than 30 bar associations, NGOs and professional lawyers’ associations – have been observing the final hearings in the mass trial that started in 2013 against 22 lawyers from the ÇHD (Progressive Lawyers Association) and the HHB (People’s Law Office). There are now only 21 left, as Ebru Timtik died – hunger-striking for a fair trial – in the course of these proceedings.

Today, these lawyers have been convicted on charges of membership in a terrorist organization and participating in terrorist propaganda, and lengthy prison sentences have been imposed.

These convictions and sentences are in total violation of the right to a fair trial, the U.N. Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers and the rule of law.

The only material facts brought to the Court were strictly linked to the defendants’ professional activities as lawyers in the field of human rights: taking part in a press conference, being present in or near a protest, advising clients of their right to remain silent, defending suspects charged with terrorism, etc. During the inquiry, some of the accused lawyers were subjected to wiretapping for over a year, in an apparent violation of the sanctity of legal professional privilege.

The U.N. Basic Principles specifically guarantee the right of lawyers to participate in public debate and to associate with each other and, further, state that lawyers must never be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes, nor suffer prosecution for any action in accordance with their professional duties.

Moreover, our colleagues were deprived of their right to a fair trial. Their request for sufficient time to present their defence was denied by the Court, which allowed only five short days of hearings for 21 defendants, and rejected the defendants’ request to postpone the hearing in order to permit a proper examination of the evidence, in particular electronic documents the authenticity of which is seriously questioned.

The trial was held in a courtroom at Silivri prison, with heavy police presence. The defendants were separated from their lawyers by two lines of police officers, hindering the ability of the defendants and their lawyers to communicate with confidentiality.

The defendants’ rights were also violated by the failure to complete proceedings within a reasonable time, as the trial has been ongoing for ten years without a proper justification for the protracted proceedings.

In addition, for several of the defendants, this trial relies on facts and evidence that have already been used in the 2017 trial against seven of the same defendants, in violation of the principle that no one should be tried twice for the same offense.

Finally, we are deeply concerned about the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law. In attacking these lawyers for their defense of human rights, it is human rights, democracy and the rule of law that are under siege.

We are always proud to stand in solidarity with our courageous colleagues, and we once again demand their immediate release.

The world is watching.

Signatures:

  • Amsterdam Bar Association
  • Asociación Libre de Abogadas y Abogados, Madrid (ALA)
  • AVOCATS.BE – Order of French- and German-speaking bar associations of Belgium
  • Berlin Bar Association
  • Bologna Bar Association
  • Bordeaux Bar Association
  • Brussels Bar Associaton
  • Conférence Régionale des Bâtonniers de l Ouest
  • Criminal Committee of the International Association of Lawyers
  • Defense Without Borders – Solidarity Lawyers, France (DSF-AS)
  • Dutch League for Human Rights
  • Épinal Bar Association
  • European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, ELDH
  • European Democratic Lawyer (AED)
  • Fair Trial Watch
  • Foundation Day of the Endangered Lawyer
  • Hauts-de-Seine Bar Association
  • Human Right Institution of Montpellier
  • La Conférence des Bâtonniers de France
  • Lawyers for Lawyers
  • Liege-Huy Bar Association
  • Lyon Bar Association
  • Marseille Bar Association
  • Montpellier Bar Association
  • National Association of Democratic Jurists, Italy (GD)
  • National Lawyers Guild, US
  • Republikanischer Anwältinnen – und Anwälteverein e.V. (RAV)
  • Syndicat des Avocats de France
  • Syndicat des Avocats Pour la Démocratie, Belgium
  • The Association for the Support of Fundamental Rights Athens, Greece
  • The Center of Research and Elaboration on Democracy/ Legal International Intervention Group
  • The German Federal Bar
  • The International Observatory for Lawyers in Danger (OIAD) composed by 47 bar associations from Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Turkey, Cameroon and Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Toulouse Bar
  • UIA-IROL (the Institute for the Rule of Law of the International Association of Lawyers)