Turkey: New Wave of Arbitrary Detentions — Lawyers Once Again Under Attack

Urgent international call for the immediate release of lawyers and ÇHD-members Atty. Ezgi Önalan, Atty.Yunus Emre Işık, Boran Işıldak, Burhan Can, Halil Arbağ and Atty. Özge Usanmaz — as well as Atty.Doğa İncesu, Atty. Semra Demir and Atty. Kürşat Bafra.

7 July 2026

We, the undersigned organizations, write to express our grave concern regarding the latest detentions inTurkey targeting lawyers, among others. We demand the immediate release of those detained and an endto arbitrary police custody.

On Sunday, 5 July 2026 further large-scale, coordinated police operations were carried out across İstanbul, Eskişehir, Antalya and İzmir. Journalists, students, academics and, once more, lawyers have been taken into custody. Among those currently detained are our colleagues of the Progressive Lawyers Association (Çağdaş Hukukçular Derneği, ÇHD) :

• Atty. Ezgi Önalan, Chair of the İstanbul Branch of ÇHD, whose door was forced open by police during her arrest;

• Atty. Yunus Emre Işık, member of ÇHD;

Boran Işıldak and Burhan Can, members of the ÇHD İstanbul Branch Student, Intern and Worker Lawyer Commission;

Halil Arbağ, member of the ÇHD İzmir Branch Student Commission.

Once again, the circumstances surrounding the detention of our colleagues raise concerns about violations of due process and the right to a fair defense: As in previous cases, the authorities imposed a confidentiality order (secrecy decision) on the investigation file, along with a 24-hour restriction on access to counsel. These restrictions prevent the detainees and their defense teams from accessing the specific accusations and alleged evidence against them during the critical initial phase of custody. Arbitrary and recurring measures such as these severely undermine the fundamental right to a fair trial and directly interfere with the right to defense.

These latest targeted detentions form part of a wave of arbitrary detentions carried out across Turkey in the days immediately preceding the 36th NATO Summit, to be held in Ankara on 7–8 July 2026. We note that simultaneous pre-dawn raids in Ankara and İstanbul placed three of our ÇHD-colleagues into police detention on 23 June 2026 — Atty. Doğa İncesu, Atty. Semra Demir and Atty. Kürşat Bafra. Furthermore, on 1 July 2026, Atty. Veysi Çetin, Secretary of the İzmir Branch of ÇHD, was arrested. While he was released after four days, Doğa İncesu, Semra Demir and Kürşat Bafra remain detained on remand to this day.

Additionally, on 5 July 2026, ten lawyers, who had attended the protests against the NATO summit, were taken into custody in Ankara. The following day, ÇHD-member Atty. Özge Usanmaz was arrested in Ankara. She had traveled from İstanbul to Ankara to visit some of her clients, who had been previously detained on 4 July 2026.

We therefore urgently call upon the relevant authorities to:

• Ensure the immediate and unconditional release of Ezgi Önalan, Yunus Emre Işık, Boran Işıldak,Burhan Can, Halil Arbağ, Özge Usanmaz, Doğa İncesu, Semra Demir and Kürşat Bafra, and all other individuals arbitrarily detained in connection with these recent operations;

• Guarantee full and unimpeded access to independently retained legal counsel of the detainees’ own choosing at every stage of the proceedings;• Lift any confidentiality orders imposed on the relevant investigation files, and ensure full access for defense teams to case materials and evidence;

• End the ongoing criminalization of the legal profession, and the systematic use of disproportionate force.

We further call on the international community to:

• Raise these concerns with the Turkish government through all available bilateral and multilateral channels, as well as publicly, and urge Turkey to end the use of the criminal justice system as a preemptive tool to silence civil society, the legal profession, and public discourse ahead of the 36th NATO Summit and beyond.

We stand in unwavering solidarity with our colleagues in Turkey, and will continue to monitor these developments closely.

Signatories (updated 8 July 2026):

Asociación Americana de Juristas

Associação Portuguesa de Juristas Democratas

Avocats Européens Démocrates

European Democratic Lawyers (AED-EDL)

Bologna Bar Association

Brescia Bar Association

Centro di ricerca ed elaborazione per la democrazia (CRED)

Defense Commission of the Barcelona Bar Association

Défense Sans Frontière – Avocats Solidaires (DSFAS)

Democratic Lawyers Switzerland

European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights (ELDH)

European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA)

Foundation Day of the Endangered Lawyer

GeBehatokia – Bask Country

German Bar Association (DAV)

German Federal Bar (BRAK)

Grenoble Bar Association

Human Rights Legal Project Indian Association of Lawyers

Institut des Droits de l’Homme du Barreau de MONTPELLIER (IDH)

International Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL)

International Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL)

International Association of Russian Advocates

International Observatory for Lawyers at Risk (OIAD)

Lawyers for the Rule of Law

Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada

Legal Centre Lesvos

National Lawyers Guild, International

National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL)

New York City Bar Association

Republican Lawyers’ Association (RAV)

Torino (Turin) Bar Association

Union of Peoples Lawyers in Mindanao

Statement of the European Democratic Lawyers (AED) On the Arrest of Two Lawyers During a Peaceful Protest at the Dutch Parliament

The European Democratic Lawyers (AED -EDL), The European Association of Lawyers for Democracy & Human Rights (ELDH) and the Internal Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL) express their deep concern regarding the arrest of two Dutch lawyers during a peaceful protest near the Dutch Parliament (Tweede Kamer) in The Hague. According to reports, the lawyers were participating as legal observers in a non-violent demonstration linked to solidarity with Palestine when they were detained by police authorities.
The demonstration was organized to call the urgent attention of Dutch politicians, the government and parliament to the military intervention carried out by the Israeli army against a large group of activists who were attempting to reach Gaza by sea. After the activists were taken from international waters, including several Dutch nationals reportedly held incommunicado at an unknown location, the demonstrators sought to demand immediate political action and protection for those unlawfully detained.
The protest took place at a location of obvious political relevance: the House of Representatives. Participants, ranging from young people to elderly demonstrators, had gathered peacefully to express their concern and to call on the Dutch authorities to respond to Israel’s ongoing violations of international law, including the blockade of Gaza, the denial of basic necessities, the killing of civilians, and the continued disregard for decisions and principles of international courts.
We are alarmed by reports that, instead of facilitating the exercise of the right to demonstrate, the police surrounded the group, failed to give clear and effective instructions, refused meaningful communication, and suddenly announced the arrest of everyone present. Demonstrators were reportedly pushed together into a confined space, held for a long period in cold, rain and wind, and then transported by bus to the ADO stadium at the edge of the city, where they were later released.
We are especially disturbed by the treatment of two observing lawyers, Hans Gaasbeek and Anne van Schaik, who were present on behalf of the Vereniging Sociale Advocatuur Nederland to monitor respect for fundamental rights. Despite clearly identifying themselves as legal observers, they were also detained, arrested and removed together with the demonstrators. The refusal of the police, the command structure and the Mayor’s representatives to engage with observing lawyers is unacceptable in a democratic society governed by the rule of law.
The presence of lawyers at demonstrations is not an obstacle to public order. On the contrary, it is an important safeguard for fundamental rights. Treating legal observers as if their role were irrelevant sends a dangerous message, both to demonstrators and to those who monitor state conduct.
We are further concerned by reports of masked police officers, aggressive pushing, the absence of clear warnings or lawful instructions, and the apparent refusal to explain the legal basis for the mass arrest and removal of demonstrators. Such conduct has an intimidating effect and risks discouraging people from exercising their right to protest.
The signatories of this statement recall that the right to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression are fundamental democratic rights protected under the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Lawyers, like all citizens, have the right to participate in peaceful public demonstrations without fear of intimidation, arbitrary arrest, or reprisals.
The arrest of legal professionals engaged in peaceful protest raises serious concerns regarding the shrinking space for democratic expression in Europe, particularly in relation to solidarity with the Palestinian people and opposition to the ongoing atrocities in Gaza. Across Europe, we are witnessing an increasing pattern of restrictions, surveillance, and criminalization targeting activists, students, journalists, and lawyers who express support for Palestinian rights.

The signatories further recall the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, in particular Article 23, which affirms that lawyers are entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association, and assembly, and have the right to take part in public discussion concerning the law, the administration of justice, and the promotion and protection of human rights.

These principles is also enshrined in article 7 of Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer signed on the 13 May 2025 by Netherlands which clearly state the right of lawyers to individually and collectively, and of professional associations to promote the rule of law and adherence to it, to take part in public discussion on the substance, interpretation and application of existing and proposed legal provisions, judicial decisions, the administration of and access to justice and the promotion and protection of human rights, as well as to make proposals for reforms concerning these matters

The use of police powers against peaceful demonstrators — especially against members of the legal profession — risks creating a chilling effect on democratic participation and undermines the rule of law. Measures restricting demonstrations must remain strictly necessary and proportionate. Peaceful protest cannot be treated as a threat to public order merely because it expresses political dissent.

The signatories therefore call on the Dutch authorities to:
• Respect and protect the right to peaceful protest and freedom of expression ;
• Ensure that lawyers are able to exercise their civic and professional rights without intimidation or arrest;
• Drop any charges or proceedings which could arise solely from participation in peaceful protest;
• Refrain from the growing criminalization of solidarity movements connected to Palestine.
• To launch an investigation to identify the law enforcement officers and politicians responsible for the violation of the rights of the demonstrators and the participating lawyers, and to hold them criminally accountable.
At a moment when the credibility of international justice is under profound attack, protecting the right to dissent is more essential than ever, AED stands in solidarity with the arrested lawyers and with all those defending democratic freedoms, human rights, and international law

Ending the Genocide in Gaza, Upholding International Law, Defending the Rule of Law, Democracy and Long-standing World Peace

The  UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel has confirmed in its report of September 16, 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.

This determination reflects what legal experts, civil society, and humanitarian actors have denounced for months: the mass killing of civilians, the destruction of essential infrastructure, and the deliberate use of famine as a weapon of war, contributing to the intentional and systematic destruction of Palestinians as a group. Hospitals, universities, schools, and housing have been systematically destroyed. Access to food, water, and medicine has been deliberately obstructed, and famine has been formally declared by UN mechanisms.

This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by natural disaster; it is the direct result of deliberate policies implemented by the government of Israel and its Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who is currently facing an arrest warrant issued on 21 November 2024 for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity as part of the ICC investigation in Palestine.

Defiance of International Justice

On 19 July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its Advisory Opinion, finding that Israel’s occupation policies and practices, including in East Jerusalem, are incompatible with international law. It emphasized that all states have an obligation not to recognize or aid unlawful situations and to act to bring them to an end.

The UN General Assembly welcomed the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion and ordered Israel to end the illegal occupation of Palestinian territory as soon as possible, but no later than September 18, 2025. This deadline has now passed, yet the illegal occupation continues. In fact, the Israeli government has continued to escalate violations: accelerating settlement expansion, pursuing forcible transfer, and openly defying binding international legal rulings. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has warned that impunity is fueling ongoing atrocities and that the credibility of international law itself is at stake.

The AED also condemns the United States’ punitive measures against UN experts and its announced and earlier designated sanctions against judges and prosecutors of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and is equally alarmed by the measures taken against the UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese, and human rights organizations engaged in the ICC’s criminal investigation of Israeli members of government. By targeting independent international justice mechanisms, these actions not only obstruct victims’ access to justice but undermine the global system of accountability painstakingly built after the horrors of the Second World War.

Europe’s Complicity Through Inaction

European governments and the EU have failed in their legal and moral obligations. Despite mounting evidence of genocide and the ICJ’s rulings, they have refused to adopt necessary measures, accordingly to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which provides that states are obliged to prevent and punish genocide. Inaction in the face of overwhelming evidence is not neutrality — it can be interpreted as complicity.

Breaking Silence: International Solidarity in Action

The AED also salutes the courage of all the solidarity activists that seek to break the unlawful blockade of Gaza and deliver essential humanitarian supplies. UN experts have affirmed the legitimacy of this action and called for full protection of the Flotilla and its participants. In the face of deliberate starvation policies, the Global Sumud Flotilla represents the spirit of international solidarity and civil resistance against impunity. 

The AED reaffirms its support for such initiatives and condemns the unlawful and forceful interception of the Global Sumud Flotilla vessels and detention of the solidarity activists off the coast of Gaza for just carrying out an entirely peaceful humanitarian mission.

Solidarity with Palestinian Lawyers

The AED expresses its full solidarity with Palestinian lawyers and bar association, who are themselves under attack. Israel has bombed the headquarters of the Palestine Bar Association in Gaza, destroyed archives, and obliterated the legal infrastructure of justice, including courthouses, law offices and the Palace of Justice. At least two-hundred Palestinian lawyers have been killed, while those who survive face the destruction of their homes, offices, and livelihoods. (11)

The AED also condemns the U.S. sanctions against Al-Haq, the Al Mezan Center for Human Rights (Al Mezan), and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) – key Palestinian human rights organizations pursuing international criminal accountability for crimes committed in Palestine – directly and adversely interfering with the ability of Palestinian lawyers to carry out their crucial work. (12)

In the West Bank, lawyers continue to endure daily harassment, restrictions. These attacks not only target individuals but also seek to annihilate the very possibility of justice for Palestinians. The AED recalls that the protection of lawyers and judicial institutions is a cornerstone of the rule of law, and their destruction is itself a crime that demands accountability.

In light of the gravity of the situation, AED urgently calls upon EU governments to take action to establish:

  • An immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, immediate, the liberation of all hostages and political prisoners illegally detained.
  • The recognition of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and concrete steps to end the unlawful occupation.
  • Unhindered and comprehensive humanitarian access to end the man-made famine without delay.
  • Full support for international accountability, including ICC investigations and prosecutions of those responsible for genocide and other international crimes.
  • Effective sanctions against Israel, including the suspension of arms transfers and all international agreements that facilitate grave violations of international law.

These demands are urgent not only for the survival and dignity of the Palestinian people but also for the integrity of the international legal order and the health of democracy itself. To remain silent or inactive in the face of genocide is to betray the very foundations of international law.

The AED stands with all those who defend justice, human rights, and peace, and reaffirms its commitment to fight against impunity, and the erosion of democratic freedoms.


European Democratic Lawyers (AED)F

On the Revocation of the President of the Istanbul Bar Association.

AED- EDL firmly condemns the revocation of the Istanbul Bar President İbrahim Kaboğlu, and the dissolution of the Board for alleged acts of terrorist propaganda.
 
This dissolution follows the judicial procedure initiated on January 14, 2025 by the Istanbul Prosecutor General in retaliation for the statement issued by the Bar Association on December 21, 2024 condemning the deaths of journalists Nazım Daştan and Cihan Bilgin, who were allegedly killed in a Turkish drone strike in northern Syria.

AED-EDL strongly recalls that professional organisations, including the Bars and Law Societies, have the right and duty to express their views on matters of public interest, in particular when they concern the rule of law and human rights.

This dissolution is an instrumentalization of legal proceedings by the Turkish authorities with the sole aim of preventing the Istanbul Bar Association from exercising its fundamental right to freedom of expression in accordance with international instruments and the principles governing the legal profession.
 
The court decision is a clear attack on the independence and functioning of the Istanbul Bar Association, an institution that plays together with the professional organisation a vital role in safeguarding human rights and defending the rule of law in Turkey.

AED-EDL urges the Turkish authorities not to implement this decision which clearly violates article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers

The AED-EDL express its full support and deepest solidarity to all the member of Istanbul Bar Association and its President who are once again facing these measures, which are a flagrant violation of international human rights law and the principles governing the legal profession.

The Erosion of Legal Independence and Professional Rights in BELARUS

The DAY OF THE ENDANGERED LAWYER is commemorated annually on the 24th of January. On this date, January 24,1977, four trade union lawyers and the employee of a law firm were murdered in their office in the Atocha street of the Spanish capital Madrid, when a group of men broke into their office. These lawyers were assassinated for exercising their profession and with the aim of instilling fear and destabilizing Spain’s democratic system after decades of Franco’s unlawful dictatorship.
Since 2010, and in remembrance of the Atocha Massacre, January 24 has been chosen to highlight the difficulties and dangers of lawyers in the exercise of their profession. Every year the focus is on one particular country, where lawyers are being harassed, silenced, pressured, threatened, persecuted and even tortured or murdered.
In past years, the Day has focused on countries like China, Iran, Egypt or Turkey and the number of organisations and bar associations joining the Coalition of the Day of the Endangered Lawyer has grown steadily, acquiring global importance.

Protecting lawyers from persecution and constraints in the exercise of their work is of vital importance for a functioning democracy.
As such, the UN has set forth a set of principles, to promote and ensure the proper role of lawyers, should be respected and taken into account by Governments within the framework of their national legislation.
Under these basic principles, “Governments shall ensure that lawyers are able to perform all of their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference.” In addition, lawyers, like other citizens, are entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association and assembly. In particular, they have the right to take part in public discussion of matters concerning the law, the administration of justice and the promotion and protection of human rights, and to join or form local, national or international organizations and attend their meetings, without suffering professional restrictions by reason of their lawful actions or their membership in a lawful organization.

These principles, known as the Havana Principles furthermore protect the independence of professional associations of lawyers and the appropriate procedures for disciplinary proceedings to ensure lawyers can work independently and without fear of repression in account of their work.

The Erosion of Legal Independence and Professional Rights in BELARUS
This year, the Day of the Endangered Lawyer is dedicated to the plight of lawyers und human rights defenders in Belarus. The findings of the report, on which our claims are based, indicate a troubling deterioration of the situation of lawyers in Belarus since 2020. In fact, there seems to be persistent trend in Belarus where legal practitioners face increasing criminal sanctions, arbitrary detentions, and systemic interference in their professional duties.
The legal framework and practices currently observed in Belarus deeply infringe on lawyers’ rights by enforcing excessive restrictions on freedom of expression, arbitrarily interpreting and applying these restrictions, and penalising participation in lawful international activities. There is a critical need for reform and strict adherence to legal principles that protect the independence and professional activities of lawyers to restore fairness and justice within the legal system in Belarus.
Furthermore, the combination of state bodies, bar associations, and state media has created an atmosphere of intimidation that severely impacts the legal profession’s integrity. Such an atmosphere not only targets individual lawyers but also seeks to inhibit the entire legal community from effectively performing their duties, thus directly infringing on the rights of clients and compromising the integrity of legal defense, especially in politically sensitive cases.
The Belarusian state’s actions contravene both national laws and international standards. These actions include misusing ethical standards to sanction lawyers for their professional and public expressions, thereby stifling dissent and curbing lawful advocacy. This systemic assault is aimed at silencing the legal community and inhibiting its ability to uphold democratic principles and human rights effectively.


-Joint Statement – The International Legal Community Condemns the Detention of Attorney Şiar Rişvanoğlu

The undersigned organizations vehemently condemn the detention of Attorney Şiar Rişvanoğlu, who is registered with the Adana Bar Association and a member of the Progressive Lawyers Association (ÇHD), following a police raid on his residence and subsequent arrest at the Çukurova airport in Tarsus.

On the morning of 26 November 2024, authorities executed a raid at Attorney Rişvanoğlu’s home without his presence, as he was traveling by plane. Subsequently, he was detained directly from the Çukurova airport upon his arrival. Notably, the raid was conducted without the presence or oversight of a prosecutor or representative from the Adana Bar Association and was only witnessed by a local community leader. A confidentiality order was promptly issued, and Attorney Rişvanoğlu was subjected to a 24-hour restriction on communication with his defense team, complicating his right to a fair defense.

Attorney Rişvanoğlu’s health remains stable, and there have been no reports of mistreatment. However, the charges against him purportedly relate to membership of a ‘terrorist’ organization, and the circumstances surrounding his detention raise significant concerns regarding adherence to legal norms and human rights.

As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and European Convention on Human Rights, Turkey has an obligation to ensure, inter alia, that no-one is subject to arbitrary arrest or detention.

Furthermore, in accordance with international standards, lawyers must be able to perform all their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference; and shall not suffer, or be threatened with, prosecution or administrative, economic or other sanctions for any action taken in accordance with recognised professional duties, standards and ethics.

The arrest and detention of Attorney Rişvanoğlu are a clear violation of his human rights, including the right to a fair trial and must cease immediately. His rights must be safeguarded; he must be treated fairly and have full access to his lawyers.

Therefore, the undersigned organizations urge the Turkish authorities to: 1. Release Attorney Şiar Rişvanoğlu immediately.

  1. Immediately and unconditionally ensure that Attorney Şiar Rişvanoğlu is afforded a fair trial and that his legal rights are fully respected, including access to his legal team and disclosure of the accusations against him.
  2. Takeallnecessarymeasurestoguaranteetherightstodueprocessandaccessto justice for Attorney Şiar Rişvanoğlu.
  3. Guarantee,inallcircumstances,thatalllawyersinTurkeyareabletocarryout their professional duties without fear of reprisals, undue restrictions, or judicial harassment, in compliance with the United Nations Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers.
  4. Ensure the rights of persons deprived of their liberty are respected at all times.

The undersigned organizations remind the prosecution office, relevant court and the Turkish authorities that the international community is closely monitoring the treatment of legal professionals in Turkey. The actions taken against Attorney Şiar Rişvanoğlu not only affect him but also impact the broader perception of justice and rule of law within the country.

The undersigned organizations will observe the ongoing process with strong attention.

AED-EDL (European Democratic Lawyers)

Centro di ricerca ed elaborazione per la democrazia

Syndicat des Avocats pour la Démocratie

The Law Society of England and Wales

Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati di Torino – Italia

International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI)

Legal Team Italia

VSAN (Association of Social Lawyers in the Netherlands)

Giuristi Democratici – Italy

Institut des Droits de l’Homme Barreau de Montpellier

Lawyers for Lawyers

Comissió de Defensa de l’Il·lustre Col·legi de l’Advocacia de Barcelona

European Association of Lawyers for Democracy & World Human Rights (ELDH)

International Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL)

Republikanischer Anwältinnen- und Anwälteverein (RAV e.V.)

Vereinigung Demokratischer Juristinnen und Juristen e.V. (VDJ)

Deutscher Anwaltverein e.V.

Institut des Droits de L’Homme du Barreau de Bordeaux

Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers

Unione delle Camere Penali Italiane, Italia

International Association of Democratic Lawyers

Basque Country Observatory of Human Rights

Défense Sans Frontière – Avocats Solidaires

the Dutch League for Human Rights.

Swiss Democratic Lawyers

Berlin Bar Association

International Observatory for Lawyers in Danger (OIAD)

Avocats sans frontières

Asociación Americana de Juristas

Download the statement

On the arrest of lawyer Berdirhan Sarsılmaz

We, the AED-EDL European Lawyers’ Association, have come to know that on the 25th of October, lawyer Bedirhan Sarsılmaz was taken into custody. At the moment of his detention, lawyer Bedirhan Sarsılmaz, had just finished his plea as part of the defense counsel of his client and was exercising his profession.

Lawyer Bedirhan Sarsılmaz of the Istanbul bar association, is member of the ÖHD, an Association of Lawyers for Freedom, member organization of the AED-EDL, a confederation of lawyers’ associations sharing the same democratic ideals: to defend the rights of citizens by preserving the independence of lawyers.

The AED-EDL condemns this arrest, which is in clear violation with the fundamental principles of law and a direct intervention in the right of the defense as set out in the Havana Principles of 1990. These Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers were adopted to protect lawyers during the exercise of their profession. The principles further provide, “Lawyers shall not be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their functions.”

The AED-EDL considers the conditions of arrest of our colleague Bedirhan Sarsılmaz unacceptable and asks for his immediate release. We will continue to follow with attention.

Wednesday, 31st October 2024
Madrid, Paris, Berlin, Amsterdam, Rome, Brussels, Athens

Download the press statement

Le monde entier regarde

Une délégation de plus de 60 observateurs internationaux condamne le jugement de la Cour dans le cadre des poursuites pénales engagées depuis une décennie contre 21 avocats de ÇHD (Progressive Lawyers’ Association) et HHB (People’s Law Office) : La délégation prévient que “le monde entier regarde”.

 

Cette semaine, nous – plus de 60 avocats de 9 pays représentant plus de 30 barreaux, ONG et associations professionnelles d’avocats – avons observé les dernières audiences du procès de masse qui a débuté en 2013 contre 22 avocats du ÇHD (Association des avocats progressistes) et du HHB (Bureau du droit du peuple). Il n’en reste désormais plus que 21, Ebru Timtik étant décédé – en grève de la faim pour un procès équitable – au cours de ces procédures.

Aujourd’hui, ces avocats ont été condamnés pour appartenance à une organisation terroriste et participation à la propagande terroriste, et de longues peines de prison ont été prononcées.

Ces condamnations et ces peines constituent une violation intégrale du droit à un procès équitable, des Principes de base des Nations unies relatifs au rôle du barreau et de l’État de droit.

Les seuls faits matériels portés à la connaissance de la Cour étaient strictement liés aux activités professionnelles des accusés en tant qu’avocats dans le domaine des droits de l’homme : participation à une conférence de presse, présence dans ou à proximité d’une manifestation, conseil à des clients sur leur droit de garder le silence, défense de suspects accusés de terrorisme, etc. Au cours de l’enquête, certains des avocats accusés ont été soumis à des écoutes téléphoniques pendant plus d’un an, dans une violation apparente du caractère absolu du secret professionnel des avocats.

Les Principes de base de l’ONU garantissent spécifiquement le droit des avocats à participer au débat public et à s’associer entre eux et stipulent en outre que les avocats ne doivent jamais être identifiés à leurs clients ou aux causes de leurs clients, ni faire l’objet de poursuites pour une action conforme à leurs devoirs professionnels.

De plus, nos collègues ont été privés de leur droit à un procès équitable. Leur demande de temps suffisant pour présenter leur défense a été rejetée par la Cour, qui n’a accordé que cinq petits jours d’audience pour 21 défendeurs, et a rejeté la demande des défendeurs de reporter l’audience afin de permettre un examen adéquat des preuves, en particulier des documents électroniques dont l’authenticité est sérieusement mise en doute.

Le procès s’est tenu dans une salle d’audience de la prison de Silivri, avec une forte présence policière. Les accusés ont été séparés de leurs avocats par deux rangées de policiers, ce qui a empêché les accusés et leurs avocats de communiquer en toute confidentialité.

Les droits des accusés ont également été violés par le fait que la procédure n’a pas été menée à son terme dans un délai raisonnable, le procès étant en cours depuis dix ans sans qu’il y ait de justification appropriée à la prolongation de la procédure.

De plus, pour plusieurs des accusés, ce procès repose sur des faits et des preuves qui ont déjà été utilisés dans le procès de 2017 contre sept des mêmes accusés, en violation du principe selon lequel personne ne doit être jugé deux fois pour la même infraction.

Enfin, nous sommes profondément préoccupés par l’indépendance du pouvoir judiciaire et l’état de droit. En attaquant ces avocats pour leur défense des droits de l’homme, ce sont les droits de l’homme, la démocratie et l’État de droit qui sont assiégés.

Nous sommes toujours fiers d’être solidaires de nos courageux collègues, et nous demandons une fois de plus leur libération immédiate.

Le monde entier regarde

.

Signatures:

  • Barreau d’Amsterdam
  • Asociación Libre de Abogadas y Abogados, Madrid (ALA)
  • AVOCATS.BE – Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophones de Belgique
  • Barreau de Berlin
  • Barreau de Bologne
  • Barreau de Bordeaux
  • Barreau de Bruxelles
  • Conférence Régionale des Bâtonniers de l Ouest
  • Criminal Committee of the International Association of Lawyers
  • Défense sans frontières – Avocats solidaires, France (DSF-AS)
  • Dutch League for Human Rights
  • Barreau d’Épinal
  • European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, ELDH
  • European Democratic Lawyer – Avocats européens démocrates (AED)
  • Fair Trial Watch
  • Foundation Day of the Endangered Lawyer
  • européens  Hauts-de-Seine
  • Institut des droits de l’homme de Montpellier
  • La Conférence des Bâtonniers de France
  • Lawyers for Lawyers
  • Barreau de Liege-Huy
  • Barreau de Lyon
  • Barreau de Marseille
  • Barreau de Montpellier Bar
  • National Association of Democratic Jurists, Italy (GD)
  • National Lawyers Guild, US
  • Republikanischer Anwältinnen – und Anwälteverein e.V. (RAV)
  • Syndicat des Avocats de France
  • Syndicat des Avocats Pour la Démocratie, Belgium
  • The Association for the Support of Fundamental Rights Athens, Greece
  • The Center of Research and Elaboration on Democracy/ Legal International Intervention Group
  • Le Barreau fédéral allemande
  • L’Observatoire international des avocats en danger (OIAD), composé de 47 barreaux d’Espagne, de France, d’Italie, d’Allemagne, de Suisse, de Belgique, de Turquie, du Cameroun et de la République démocratique du Congo.
  • Barreau de Toulouse
  • UIA-IROL (l’Institut pour l’État de droit de l’Association internationale des juristes)

 

The world is watching

Delegation of 60+ International Trial Observers Condemns Court Judgment in Decade-Long Criminal Prosecution of 21 Lawyers from ÇHD (Progressive Lawyers Association) and HHB (People’s Law Office): Delegation Warns That “The World is Watching”

This week, we – more than 60 lawyers from 9 countries representing more than 30 bar associations, NGOs and professional lawyers’ associations – have been observing the final hearings in the mass trial that started in 2013 against 22 lawyers from the ÇHD (Progressive Lawyers Association) and the HHB (People’s Law Office). There are now only 21 left, as Ebru Timtik died – hunger-striking for a fair trial – in the course of these proceedings.

Today, these lawyers have been convicted on charges of membership in a terrorist organization and participating in terrorist propaganda, and lengthy prison sentences have been imposed.

These convictions and sentences are in total violation of the right to a fair trial, the U.N. Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers and the rule of law.

The only material facts brought to the Court were strictly linked to the defendants’ professional activities as lawyers in the field of human rights: taking part in a press conference, being present in or near a protest, advising clients of their right to remain silent, defending suspects charged with terrorism, etc. During the inquiry, some of the accused lawyers were subjected to wiretapping for over a year, in an apparent violation of the sanctity of legal professional privilege.

The U.N. Basic Principles specifically guarantee the right of lawyers to participate in public debate and to associate with each other and, further, state that lawyers must never be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes, nor suffer prosecution for any action in accordance with their professional duties.

Moreover, our colleagues were deprived of their right to a fair trial. Their request for sufficient time to present their defence was denied by the Court, which allowed only five short days of hearings for 21 defendants, and rejected the defendants’ request to postpone the hearing in order to permit a proper examination of the evidence, in particular electronic documents the authenticity of which is seriously questioned.

The trial was held in a courtroom at Silivri prison, with heavy police presence. The defendants were separated from their lawyers by two lines of police officers, hindering the ability of the defendants and their lawyers to communicate with confidentiality.

The defendants’ rights were also violated by the failure to complete proceedings within a reasonable time, as the trial has been ongoing for ten years without a proper justification for the protracted proceedings.

In addition, for several of the defendants, this trial relies on facts and evidence that have already been used in the 2017 trial against seven of the same defendants, in violation of the principle that no one should be tried twice for the same offense.

Finally, we are deeply concerned about the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law. In attacking these lawyers for their defense of human rights, it is human rights, democracy and the rule of law that are under siege.

We are always proud to stand in solidarity with our courageous colleagues, and we once again demand their immediate release.

The world is watching.

Signatures:

  • Amsterdam Bar Association
  • Asociación Libre de Abogadas y Abogados, Madrid (ALA)
  • AVOCATS.BE – Order of French- and German-speaking bar associations of Belgium
  • Berlin Bar Association
  • Bologna Bar Association
  • Bordeaux Bar Association
  • Brussels Bar Associaton
  • Conférence Régionale des Bâtonniers de l Ouest
  • Criminal Committee of the International Association of Lawyers
  • Defense Without Borders – Solidarity Lawyers, France (DSF-AS)
  • Dutch League for Human Rights
  • Épinal Bar Association
  • European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, ELDH
  • European Democratic Lawyer (AED)
  • Fair Trial Watch
  • Foundation Day of the Endangered Lawyer
  • Hauts-de-Seine Bar Association
  • Human Right Institution of Montpellier
  • La Conférence des Bâtonniers de France
  • Lawyers for Lawyers
  • Liege-Huy Bar Association
  • Lyon Bar Association
  • Marseille Bar Association
  • Montpellier Bar Association
  • National Association of Democratic Jurists, Italy (GD)
  • National Lawyers Guild, US
  • Republikanischer Anwältinnen – und Anwälteverein e.V. (RAV)
  • Syndicat des Avocats de France
  • Syndicat des Avocats Pour la Démocratie, Belgium
  • The Association for the Support of Fundamental Rights Athens, Greece
  • The Center of Research and Elaboration on Democracy/ Legal International Intervention Group
  • The German Federal Bar
  • The International Observatory for Lawyers in Danger (OIAD) composed by 47 bar associations from Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Turkey, Cameroon and Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Toulouse Bar
  • UIA-IROL (the Institute for the Rule of Law of the International Association of Lawyers)

Une délégation d’avocates et avocats d’Europe et des États-Unis observe le procès CHD à Silivri Le procès qui dure déjà depuis 10 ans

En 2013, il y a dix ans, un procès de masse a débuté contre 22 avocates et avocats, tous membres de l’organisation d’avocats Progressive Lawyers’ Association (ÇHD, Turquie) et du People’s Law Office (HHB). Depuis, jusqu’à trois audiences ont eu lieu chaque année – d’abord devant la “Cour d’assises spéciale” (la Haute Cour pénale), puis, en 2014, après un changement dans la loi de procédure pénale de la Turquie, devant la Haute Cour penale ordinaire.

Tous les avocats en question ont été condamnés ou font l’objet de poursuites pour leurs activités professionnelles. En violation des Principes de base des Nations unies relatifs au rôle du barreau, ils sont, d’une part, identifiés aux causes de leurs clients et, d’autre part, limités dans leur liberté d’expression, qui inclut le droit de prendre part à des débats publics sur les droits de l’homme.

Plusieurs des accusés, dont le président du ÇHD, Selçuk KOZAGAÇLI, ont déjà été soumis à des années de détention provisoire. L’une des accusées de ce procès, Ebru Timtik, est mort pendant sa grève de la faim pour obtenir des procès équitables devant les tribunaux turcs.

Des avocats d’Europe et d’autres continents ont observé toutes les audiences. Cette semaine, les observateurs internationaux comprennent plus de 60 avocats de huit pays européens et des États-Unis : Autriche, Belgique, France, Allemagne, Grèce, Italie, Pays-Bas, Espagne/Catalogne et États-Unis. Les avocats représentent divers barreaux locaux, des confédérations européennes et internationales de barreaux et d’autres organisations d’avocats.

L’article 10 de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme et l’article 14 du Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques imposent à la Turquie de garantir à tous les prévenus un procès équitable et public devant un tribunal compétent, indépendant et impartial.

Auparavant, en 2021, à l’occasion de la Journée internationale du procès équitable, dédiée la Turquie cette année-là, le jury est arrivé à la conclusion que ces normes internationales pour un procès équitable sont fréquemment violées en Turquie.

Cette semaine, les observateurs internationaux suivent de très près le procès de ÇHD afin de déterminer si le tribunal respectera les normes internationales en matière de procès équitable et si les violations antérieures de ces principes au cours de ce procès seront corrigées par le tribunal.

Les procès contre les avocats de ÇHD s’inscrivent dans un schéma plus large d’attaque contre les avocats en Turquie et d’identification de ceux-ci avec leurs clients. Les avocats sont injustement criminalisés et poursuivis pour avoir rempli leurs obligations professionnelles. Cette situation est intolérable et constitue une violation manifeste du droit international. De plus, les observateurs internationaux ont conclu que les normes internationales du procès équitable n’ont pas été respectées lors des audiences qu’ils ont observées précédemment.

Nous demandons donc la libération immédiate de tous les avocats incarcérés en raison de leur travail sur des affaires politiques. Ce n’est pas un crime d’être un avocat. Nous continuerons d’insister pour mettre fin à la criminalisation du simple exercice de la profession d’avocat et pour faire respecter les principes fondamentaux de l’État de droit, y compris le droit à un procès équitable pour tous, en Turquie et ailleurs dans le monde.

Signataires:

  • European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, ELDH
  • La Conférence des bâtonniers
  • L’association Défense Sans frontière – Avocats Solidaires (Defense Without Borders – Solidarity Lawyers, France (DSF-AS)
  • Giuristi Democratici – Association nationale des juristes démocrates, Italie
  • UIA-IROL (the Institute for the Rule of Law of the International Association of Lawyers)
  • Lawyers for Lawyers, Pays Bas
  • Le Barreau fédéral allemand
  • Union of Italian Penal Chambers (UCPI)
  • Republikanischer Anwältinnen – und Anwälteverein e.V. (RAV)
  • L’Observatoire International des Avocats en Danger (OIAD)
  • The Center of Research and Elaboration on Democracy/ Legal International Intervention Group
  • L’association catalane pour la Défense de droits de l’homme
  • La commission de défense de l’association du Barreau de Barcelona
  • Le Barreau de New York City
  • The Foundation of the Day of the Endangered Lawyer
  • The Dutch League for Human Rights
  • Avocats Européens Démocrates / European Democratic Lawyers
  • The Association for the Support of Fundamental Rights Athens, Greece
  • L’association du Barreau de Marseille
  • Fair Trial Watch
  • L’association du Barreau de Berlin
  • L’association du Barreau de Bordeaux
  • Conférence Régionale des Bâtonniers de l Ouest
  • L’association du Barreau de Epinal
  • The International Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL)
  • National Union of People’s Lawyers, the Philippines (NULP)
  • Asociación Americana de Juristas
  • Confederation of Lawyers of Asia and the Pacific (COLAP)
  • L’association du Barreau de Bruxelles
  • AVOCATS.BE – l’Ordre des associations des barreaus germanophones et francophones de Belgique
  • Syndicat des Avocats Pour la Démocratie
  • OBFG Association de l’Ordre des avocats germanophones et francophones de Belgique
  • L’association du Barreau de Liège-Huy
  • L’association du Barreau de Montpellier
  • L’association du Barreau de Lyon
  • L’association du Barreau de Amsterdam
  • L’association du Barreau de Hauts-de-Seine
  • L’association du Barreau de Grenoble
  • Institut des Droits de l’homme de Grenoble