Communiqué sur les mineurs isolés et activistes La Roya

L’assemblée générale de l’AED qui s’est tenue à Nice a été l’occasion d’échanger sur la politique migratoire européenne, avec des activistes de l’association ROYA CITOYENNE, qui sont venus témoigner de la situation des migrants à la frontière franco-italienne.

La vallée de la ROYA a été en effet, durant plusieurs mois, le théâtre d’une tragédie humaine où ont été pris en étau des migrants en détresse, dont de nombreux mineurs non accompagnés que l’Etat a refusé de prendre en charge, leur déniant la qualité d’enfant et la possibilité de demander l’asile.

L’instauration de l’état d’urgence en France avait entrainé le rétablissement de la frontière entre l’Italie et la France, poussant des centaines d’exilés à se réfugier dans la Vallée pour pouvoir passer la frontière et demander l’asile en France. Les réfugié passent désormais en France au niveau du Col de l’échelle, tentant, là encore, de survivre au péril de leur vie.

Parmi ces réfugiés, de nombreux mineurs non accompagnés venant d’Eyrthrée, d’Afghanistan, de Syrie..,ont trouvé refuge auprès des habitants de la Vallée de la Roya.

Ces habitants ont tout fait pour que les droits des ces réfugiés soient protégés, qu’ils soient accueillis dignement et puissent, pour certains déposer une demande d’asile et demander la protection de l’Etat.

Même munis de justificatifs d’ouverture d’une procédure de protection, ils faisaient l’objet de « refus d’entrée », formalisés ou pas, puis de refoulements en Italie, parfaitement illégaux et contraires au droit international.

Devant ce déni de droit et d’humanité, des citoyens n’ont eu d’autre choix que de se substituer à la carence d’un Etat aveugle et sourd. Ils sauvent la vie et rétablissent la dignité de ces hommes et femmes fuyant leurs pays. Ils accomplissent les gestes de première urgence : aide, hébergement, soins et conseils.

Ce sont ceux-là, ces citoyens solidaires, à l’instar de Cédric HERROU ou de Pierre-Alain MANNONI, que l’Etat français a décidé d’harceler, de poursuivre, de placer en garde à vue, de perquisitionner de manière gratuite et brutale et de condamner pénalement pour leurs actions en faveur du respect de la dignité humaine, les avocats qui les défendent menacés de mort.

Dans toute l’Europe, des situations de traitement indigne des réfugiés ont été constatées, des refoulements à la frontière sans possibilité de voir un avocat et d’exercer effectivement leurs droits, des violations quotidiennes des Conventions internationales.

L’AED dénonce cette politique d’exclusion et de refoulement à l’extérieur des frontières menée par les autorités des Etats Membres et les autorités européennes.

L’AED apporte son soutien aux citoyens qui n’hésitent pas à aider des hommes, des femmes, des enfants relégués aux marges de la société, afin de préserver leur dignité et dénonce le non-respect des droits fondamentaux des mineurs et – la traque des citoyens solidaires. Ce sont les politiques gouvernementales qui sont indignes.

L’AED demande l’abandon des poursuites pénales déclenchées à l’encontre de ces citoyens, et l’abrogation du délit de solidarité dans le Code de l’entrée et du séjour des étrangers du droit d’asile qui est en cours de modification en France.

Elle exige l’application de la convention  européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’Homme et des libertés fondamentales et de la Convention Internationale des droits de l’Enfant et le respect par la France notamment de ses engagements internationaux.

 

On the isolated minors and activists of the Roya Valley

The General Assembly of the AED-EDL has been held in Nice on the 9th and 10th of February 2018 and has provided us with the opportunity to discuss European migration policy with activists from the association ROYA CITIZEN who have testified of the situation of migrants on the Franco-Italian border.

For several months the ROYA Valley has been the scene of a human tragedy: a valley in which migrants are stranded in distress, including many unaccompanied minors whom the state has refused to take charge of. In fact, the state denies the quality of minor of age to these children and thus denies the possibility of granting them asylum.

The introduction of the emergency laws to regulate the state of emergency in France has led to the restoration of the border between Italy and France. This is pushing hundreds of exiles to seek refuge in the Valley, while they try to cross the border and on their way to seek asylum in France. Currently, refugees have to stopped passing by the Roya Valley and now seek to pass the Col de l’Echelle from Bardonecchia to Briancon, risking their lives in the mountains.

Among these refugees, there are many unaccompanied minors from Eritrea, Afghanistan, Syria … They have found refuge with the inhabitants of the Valley of Roya. These citizens have done everything to ensure that the rights of these refugees are protected, that they are received with dignity and are able to seek asylum and ask for state protection.

Even with proof of having begun a protection procedure, these migrants received immediate “refusals of entry”, in many case informally. They were pushed back into Italy, which is illegal and contrary to international law.

Faced with this denial of rights and humanity, citizens have had no choice but to substitute a blind and deaf state. They have helped save lives and restore the dignity of those men and women fleeing their countries. They have taken care of the first aid: accommodation, care and advice.

It is citizens who, like Cédric HERROU or Pierre-Alain MANNONI, have joined forces that are now facing the harassment of the French State, as well as prosecution, detention and arbitrary searches. Their actions aimed at the respect of human dignity have ben condemned criminally. The lawyers who defend them have been recently threatened with death.

Throughout Europe, situations of ill treatment of refugees have been noted: push-backs at the border without the possibility of accessing a lawyers’ advice and effectively exercising their own rights, as well as daily violations of international conventions.

The AED-EDL denounces this policy of exclusion and pushbacks outside the borders, at the centre of the policy of European Authorities and Member States.

The AED supports citizens who do not hesitate to help men, women and children relegated to the margins of society, to preserve their dignity. The association denounces the non-respect of the fundamental rights of minors and – the criminalization of citizens who show their solidarity. It is the government policies that are unworthy.

The AED-EDL calls for the abandonment of criminal proceedings against citizens, and the repeal of the offense of solidarity in the Code of entry and residence of foreigners of the right to asylum, which is being amended in France.

It requires the application of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the International Convention on the Rights of the Child and the respect by France of its international commitments.

Nice, 9th and 10th February

The DAY of the ENDANGERED LAWYER – PHOTO POST

   

BERLIN

                                            MADRID

 

 

                                                                                                                                          

BRUSSELS

 

ISTANBUL                                          

ANKARA                                              ADANA

   

Day of the Endangered Lawyer 2018

Today in Egypt, human rights activists, lawyers, political activists and independent journalists, all have to live with their phone calls being tapped, endless smear campaigns and hate speech from state-affiliated media as well as continuous harassment and intimidation from the authorities. Egypt is going through the most serious human rights crisis in its history. Every day security forces arbitrarily displace 3 or 4 people (AI Secretary General, 18 Dec. 2016).

After the overthrow of President Mohammed Morsi the human rights situation deteriorated dramatically. The government severely restricted freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of association. The authorities have taken harsh actions against dissidents, tens of thousands have been arbitrarily arrested, and many of them tortured during custody. Security forces who killed demonstrators have not been held accountable. After harsh unfair trials, hundreds of people have received prison or even death sentences. Victims of this persecution include not only alleged members and supporters of the Muslim brotherhood but also any other opponents to the present government, in particular alleged members of left-wing organizations and human rights activists.

This relentless persecution can even lead to arbitrary arrest, prolonged detention, harsh sentences after unfair trials and sometimes even torture, enforced disappearance at the hands of the state or death in custody as a result of medical negligence. This is pretty much the same list of human rights violations suffered by the people whose rights such defenders are meant to be protecting through their activism and work. Victims of this persecution are not only alleged members and supporters of the Muslim brotherhood but also any other opponents to the present government in particular alleged members of left-wing organizations.

Since General Al Sissi came to power, the crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood has spread to the entire democratic opposition, the media, NGOs, minorities and civil society.

Lawyers pay a heavy price. Many of them are victims of arrest, conviction, threats, travel bans from the territory and other restrictions on the practice of their profession.

By so doing, the Egyptian government violates the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990.

See  our Report on Egypt

The AED calls for demonstrations in front of the Egyptian embassies all over Europe to show our solidarity with our Egyptian colleagues in the context of the Day of the Endangered Lawyer.

The Day of the Endangered Lawyer is supported by the Foundation of the Day of the Endangered lawyer and the AED as well as by IAPL, ELDH, IDHAE, CNB-OIAD,  CCBE, UIA, Endangered lawyers, Lawyers for Lawyers. It is supported by many Bar Associations all over Europe and outside Europe.

Lettre au Président de la République

Bruxelles, Paris, Barcelone, le 4 janvier 2018

 

Monsieur le Président de la République,

Demain vous allez recevoir RECEP ERDOGAN, Président de la Turquie.

Quelques soient les enjeux diplomatiques ou autres existant entre nos pays, vous ne pouvez ignorer la situation de non-droit dans laquelle se trouvent aujourd’hui des avocats, des magistrats, des parlementaires, des journalistes, des syndicalistes… Au nom de la lutte contre le terrorisme et ce depuis le coup d’état manqué du 15 juillet 2016.

La répression arbitraire ne cesse de s’aggraver; les détentions dans des conditions assimilables à des traitements inhumains et dégradants, sans véritable accès à une défense effective se multiplient.

Les avocats qui osent encore tenter de remplir leurs fonctions sont immédiatement stigmatisés à leur tour et empêchés par des inculpations et des incarcérations sans aucun fondement. Notre organisation est particulièrement inquiète sur le sort réservé à nos confrères détenus depuis plusieurs mois sans qu’il soit possible de savoir quels sont les faits réels qui leur sont reprochés.

L’AED, association européenne d’avocats démocrates, particulièrement attachées au respect des droits de la défense et à la protection de ceux qui se trouvent en première ligne de cette défense, les avocats eux même, vous demande, Monsieur le Président, en votre qualité de représentant de nos valeurs fondamentales de liberté et de justice d’interpeller fermement votre hôte pour que nos confrères soient libérés sans délai et que les poursuites engagées contre eux soient immédiatement abandonnées.

Nous soulignons qu’un certain nombre de nos confrères actuellement incarcérés sont membres de notre association, et tout particulièrement Selçuk KOZAGACLI et l’ensemble des avocats du çHD.

Pascale Taelman

Avocate au Barreau du Val de Marne

Présidente

Seventeen Turkish lawyers are in detention in different parts of the country; sixteen of them for several weeks.

On the 8th of November 2017, Selcuk Kozagacli, President of the ÇHD, a progressive association of lawyers and a member of the AED, was arrested with great violence and detained in Istanbul. The accusations against our colleague justifying his detention by the Turkish authorities consist of complicity in terrorism.

Our colleague and friend Selcuk Kozagacli is one of the best-known human rights defenders in Turkey.

He recently denounced, during the general assembly of the Istanbul bar association held in ANKARA on the 16th of October, systematic acts of torture committed on people recently arrested, such as the tearing of nails, rape, the introduction of objects in the anus of the prisoners …

 

Today our colleague Selcuk Kozagacli is himself exposed to these same barbaric acts. To be convinced of this, it suffices to visualize the consequences of the conditions of his arrest. Our colleague is now on a hunger strike to try to force get his appearance before a judge.

 

The EDA demands the immediate release of Selcuk Kozagacli and the following sixteen lawyers from the Turkish authorities: Barkın Timtik, Ebru Timtik, Süleyman Gökten, Ezgi Çakır, Ahmet Mandacı, Yağmur Ereren, Aytaç Ünsal, Didem Baydar Ünsal , Ayşegül Çağatay, Engin Gökoğlu, Behiç Aşçı, Aycan Çiçek, Şükriye Erden, Özgür Yılmaz, Zehra Özdemir and Naciye Demi, who did not commit any other crimes than fulfilling their function of defender and denouncing the blatant violation of the rights of their clients.

 

Paris, Barcelona, Madrid, Den Haag, Berlin, Rome, Brussels…

9th November 2017.

 


Dix sept avocats turcs sont en détention, dans différentes régions du pays ; seize d’entre eux depuis plusieurs semaines.

 

Le 8 novembre 2017, Selcuk Kozagacli président du ÇHD, association d’avocats progressistes, membre de l’AED a été à son tour interpellé dans une grande violence, et placé en détention à Istanbul. Les accusations portées contre nos confrères et justifiant aux yeux des autorités turques leur détention, consistent en des faits de complicité de terrorisme

Notre confrère et ami Selcuk Kozagacli est l’un des plus connus défenseur des droit de l’homme en Turquie.

Il a récemment dénoncé, au cours de l’assemblée général des Barreaux qui s’est tenue à ANKARA le 16 octobre derniers, des actes de tortures systématiques commis sur les personnes arrêtées ces derniers temps, tel que l’arrachement des ongles, des viols, l’introduction d’objets dans l’anus des détenus…

Aujourd’hui notre confrère Selcuk Kozagacli est lui même exposé à ces mêmes actes barbares. Il suffit pour s’en convaincre de visualiser les conséquences des conditions de son interpellation

Notre confrère est aujourd’hui en grève de la faim pour tenter d’obtenir sa comparution devant un juge.

L’ AED exige des autorités turques la remise en liberté immédiate de Selcuk Kozagacli et des seize autres avocats, dont les noms suivent, Barkın Timtik, Ebru Timtik, Süleyman Gökten, Ezgi Çakır, Ahmet Mandacı, Yağmur Ereren, Aytaç Ünsal, Didem Baydar Ünsal, Ayşegül Çağatay, Engin Gökoğlu, Behiç Aşçı, Aycan Çiçek, Şükriye Erden, Özgür Yılmaz, Zehra Özdemir et Naciye Demi, qui n’ont pas commis d’autres crimes que de remplir leur fonction de défenseur et de dénoncer l’absence la violations flagrantes des droits les plus fondamentaux de leurs clients.

 

 

What is progressive lawyering?

Conclusions of the conference: 30 years of activism

 

When I happen to be the last defender in a row, in trials with lots of participants, I often begin my closing argument saying that this looks like a double-edged sword: on the one hand one can refer to points already made, thus saving time, on the other hand one has to give effort to keep the interest of the judges alive.

There are two major differences in the present case: firstly, the points already made by the colleagues so far have given so much food for consideration that I couldn’ t even sum them up within few minutes so I just picked a couple of them to comment on; secondly, speaking to you makes things significantly better than facing sleepery judges’ faces…!

 

30 years are surely a good motivation for reflecting: reflecting upon experiences, terms, definitions, perspectives. At the same time many things have changed.

The difficulties emerge right in the first moment of the reflection on AED-subjects: who are we talking about? How can we define ourselves?

Left-wing lawyers: My personal dislike for this term had originally to do with my personal political preferences. But the current political situation has further complicated the situation.

And after all: what is called a lawyer who defends demonstrators in Venezuela fighting against a left-wing government? When the greek left-wing minister of justice openly seeks to interfere in a trial even if this happens in favor of a demonstrator, what is called the lawyer who protests against it and seeks to defend the separation of powers? I can only say that the term „left-wing“ appears to be rather problematic.

Movement lawyers: once again we run into theoretical burdens by just staring at the multitude of movements. Movements do unfortunately no longer move only to an emancipating direction, thus making the world more complicated. Movements can be very reactionary. What about the anti-abortion movements of catholics in Poland who, after all, fight for the fundamental right to life? Or the movements against ROMA-people who build militias in Ungarn?

I’ll give an example:

In Greece, gold mine workers fight for their right to work, against the closing down of the mines. They also fight against a left-wing government and three days ago they even occupied the ministry. But their fight is completely anti-ecological, so there’s a kind of civil war going on between them and the anti-gold movement I defend. But aren’t the workers a movement themselves?

Progressive lawyers: this could be an acceptable compromise, though not the best. Progressive can exclude reactionary lawyers, when it comes to movements and signalises the fight against stagnation. For sure you want to get things rolling towards a better future. But what should be the characteristics of a progressive lawyer?

I was very happy to hear Anne Maeschalk‘s remark that introduced the criterium of quality of work: a progressive lawyer in the first place should acquire particular competences so as to be useful, in other words he/she has to be a good lawyer. It serves nothing to supply somebody with legal support of low quality. Unfortunately the latter is often the case back home, when it comes to the defence of demonstrators. Standing as a competent jurist on the side of a movement fills it with pride and dignity: the confrontation with the almighty state power is not like down the street, where the police mechanism is highly equipped and usually beats off the demonstrators; in the courtroom, a good legal defence along with conscious defendants can not seldom celebrate victories against the state.

Then a progressive lawyer must be a solidary lawyer: once again we come across a hard definition, but I could give it a try saying that a solidary lawyer is one who sets the financial aspect of the mandate aside, because he/she is touched by the cause of the struggle to a certain extent. The values at stake are what moves most the lawyer in this case, rather than the professional aspect. In this direction, the lawyer should be able to even defend people that he doesn’t particularly like, if he recognises that the political-legal-human rights stakes are of greater importance the person of the defendant himself. Ceren’s example of the not-solidarity for persecuted judges and persecutors who had taken bad decisions against Kurds etc. in the past gives food for thought in this direction. I can realise what it feels being overloaded and it’s fair enough giving priority to solidarity to other people who deserve it more. But let’s assume the case of such a judge was the only one; should we then leave him alone due to his past decisions or consider the importance of the independence of judiciary and the separation of powers and support him?

A side that wasn’t particularly discussed in the panels is the structure of the office of a progressive lawyer. Lawyers‘ collectives are rather an exception, but can a progressive lawyer be solidary to the movements while he exploits for instance some young lawyers? Can a progressive lawyer work in a hierarchically structured environment and support at the same time emancipation struggles? It’s a long discourse, many fascinating stories could then be heard, as well as experiences of dissappointments. But in an effort to be precise about which lawyers AED represents or includes, I think that this is an important aspect. Of course, the accumulated experience of the legal teams is a relevant topic; AED c proud to have supported most if not all of them.

A further question regards the presentation of political contents in the courtroom. I tend to believe that this is rather the duty of the defendants themselves; the lawyer has to understand the political frame, try to deconstruct the inconsistencies, denounce the indictment, uncover the plots of the police, but not replace the subject of the struggle. It’s often tempting to politicize during a trial; experience has taught me that resisting this temptation gains the respect of the judges which is then reflected positively upon the defendants themselves. And after all: criticizing the behaviour of the police, the system of justice, the law, the processual misconducts, making mistreatments public, suing cases of torture etc – isn’t all this political enough? Presenting the cause of a struggle, its achievements and its goals, this is all a task for the defendants in the first place.

One of the questions also raised today concerned the independence of the lawyer from the client. Should the lawyer present any argument the defendant wishes? Or the contrary: I happened to defend a group of nihilist anarchists who asked me to refrain from any legal arguments during the trial and just denounce the methods of the antiterrorist department etc. I rejected. I think that a lawyer should preserve his/her own dignity. This component „free“ in the word freelance or in the even better word Freiberuf has to mean something, doesn’t it? Or another example has to do with the limits that everybody lawyer sets to himself: can somebody defend a guy who accuses his comrades? Who just changed his mind and regretted former actions? Who is possibly a consequent fighter but too macho within his group? I don’t intend to risk even general answers, because they’re a personal matter of each one of us. What’s for sure, we should see the freedom in our choices while exercising our profession as limitless; if we don’t want it to let it be restrained by the judges, we certainly cannot let our clients deprive us of it.

 

Actually I don’t think that my intervention contained the conclusions it was supposed to. But since there was a „view ahead“ in the initial programme that waw originally sent to me, I just made some sporadic remarks about that. But I’m convinced that AED has the experience, the determination and the potential to view ahead in the next 30 years.

Harry Ladis

 

New Arrests / Nouvelles Arrestations

The AED demands that the Turkish Government stop all hostility against human rights lawyers. The numerous irregular and arbitrary detentions are an authoritarian and repressive response against Turkish lawyers, charged with terrorism or activities against the state. The Republic of Turkey is a member of the Council of Europe and must therefore respect and promote the defence of human rights.

We are asking for the immediate release of lawyers:

– Me. UÇAR Sezin

– Me. GÜMÜŞTAS Özlem

– Me. Gulhan KAYA

The first two were arrested October 19th around 2 o’clock in the morning. The latest news is that they are still held in the anti-terrorist section of Vatan, where they can be held for 7 days. All offices were searched. Even the apartment in which the 3 lawyers live was searched in violation of the Turkish Code of Criminal Procedure (without the presence of the prosecutor, or an official of the Bar, or the mayor and without witnesses). Thus, computers and digital equipment were seized. Four months ago, as part of the same investigation, the lawyers went to testify and submitted an application to the judge. Despite this, the judge found it more appropriate to search the offices and the home.

All three are members of “ezilenlerin hukuk bürosu” (Legal Office of the Opponents). They are active in the HDP and have represented the co-chair of this political formation. They currently defend the families of the dead young people murdered in Suruç and have intervened in the bomb case in Ankara.

These are only a part of the arrests: Nihat Goktas is on hunger strike, Ozgen Sadet (sister of a victim of the Suruç massacre) has been arrested, together with journalists from Etkin Haber, Ajansi Isimaz Temel and Havva Custan and 11 others. There are arrest warrants for more than 10 people.

The AED denounces these political detentions and demands the release of the imprisoned colleagues and all the persons concerned.

Créteil, Barcelona, Harlem, on the 22nd October 2017

AED- EDL (European Democratic Lawyers) & The Foundation of the Endangered Lawyer

 


 

L’AED exige du Gouvernement turc l’arrêt de toute hostilité contre les avocats défenseurs des Droits de l’Homme. Continuellement des détentions irrégulières et arbitraires se produisent comme réponse autoritaire et répressive contre les avocats et juristes turcs, moyennant des chefs d’accusations de terrorisme ou activités contre l’État. La République de Turquie est membre du Conseil de l’Europe et doit donc respecter et promouvoir la défense de Droits de l’Homme.

Nous demandons ici, la mise immédiate en liberté des avocats:

– Me. UÇAR Sezin

– Me. GÜMÜŞTAS Özlem

– Me. Gulhan KAYA

Les deus premières ont été arrêtées le 19 octobre vers 2 heures du matin. Aux dernières nouvelles elles sont toujours détenues à la section antiterroriste de Vatan/İstanbul avec possibilité d’être maintenues pendant 7 jours. Tous les bureaux ont été perquisitionnés. L’appartement dans lequel vivent les 3 avocats a également été perquisitionné en violation du code de procédure pénale turque (sans la présence du procureur, ou du fonctionnaire du Barreau, ou du maire et sans témoins). Ainsi, des ordinateurs et du matériel digital ont été saisis. Pourtant, il y a 4 mois de cela, dans le cadre de l’enquête, les avocats étaient allés témoigner et avaient soumis une requête au juge. Malgré cela, ce dernier a trouvé plus adapté de faire des perquisitions dans les cabinets et le domicile.

Tous trois sont membres de “ezilenlerin hukuk bürosu” (Bureau légal des opposants). Ils sont aussi actifs dans le HDP et ont représenté le coprésident de cette formation politique. Ils défendent les familles des jeunes gens morts assassinés à Suruç et interviennent également dans le cas dossier de la Bombe à Ankara.

D’autre part, Nihat Goktas (en grève de la faim), Ozgen Sadet (sœur d’une victime du massacre de Suruç), les journalistes de Etkin Haber, Ajansi Isimaz Temel et Havva Custan ainsi que 11 autres personnes ont été arrêtées. Il y a par ailleurs des mandats d’arrêt à l’encontre de plus de 10 personnes.

L’AED dénonce ces détentions politiques et demande la libération des confrères détenus et de toutes les personnes concernées.

A Créteil, Barcelone, Harlem, le 22 octobre 2017.

AED (Avocats Européens Démocrates) & Fondation de l’Avocat Menacé

 

KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF TURKISH LAWYERS!

Since mid-September, these lawyers are detained in Ankara, Istanbul and Diyarbakır.

 

The number of lawyers prosecuted in Turkey is 1343 after this last wave of raids against lawyers. 524 of them have been arrested since the staged coup attempt in July 2016.

 

There are lawyers from France, Germany, the Netherlands, Catalonia, Belgium, Spain, Greece, Italy and Turkey who share the same democratic, modern and humane ideals in Europe.

 

We are convinced that our colleagues are only exposed to state repression because of their professional activities.

We will not stop until we know they are safe. We demand the release of the lawyers who have been imprisoned!

 

European Democratic Lawyers (AED-EDL)

 

New Protests in front of Turkish Consulates in Europe

We are demonstrating today in front of the Turkish Consulate in Hamburg, The Hague, Brussels and Milan to protest the recent
arrest of 16 of our colleagues from Turkey. Since mid-September, they are detained in Ankara, Istanbul and Diyarbakır.

We are especially concerned about the situation of lawyers Barkın Timtik, Engin Gökoglu and Özgür Yılmaz. We fear that they are (again) suffering torture. These lawyers are members of the “People’s Law Office” (“People’s Law Office”) and have represented two opposers of the regime who are currently in hunger strike after being released from their teaching activities.

We are convinced that our colleagues are only exposed to state repression because of their professional activities.

The number of lawyers prosecuted in Turkey is 1343 after this last wave of raids against lawyers. 524 of them have been arrested since the staged coup attempt in July 2016.

Our protest is not just taking place here in Hamburg.

These demonstration has emerged as a common   initiative of the umbrella organization for European Democratic Lawyers (EDL).

There are lawyers from France, Germany, the Netherlands, Catalonia, Belgium, Spain, Greece, Italy and Turkey who share the same democratic, modern and humane ideals in Europe.  As a professional organization, as an international organization, it pursues the international purpose of respecting the rights of the defense in particular, the physical integrity and the political and economic freedom of lawyers.

In September, rallies were held in Berlin, Madrid, Paris, Amsterdam, Barcelona, Brussels. Even today, many other cities are to be demonstrated before Turkish interests.

We will not give peace and our colleagues will not be left in the lurch. We demand the release of the lawyers who have been imprisoned!